<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing App-V for Dynamics NAV RTC 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gotcal.com/index.php/2010/07/testing-app-v-for-dynamics-nav-rtc-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gotcal.com/index.php/2010/07/testing-app-v-for-dynamics-nav-rtc-2009/</link>
	<description>Inside C/Side, Tools and random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:06:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dynamics Community Syndication of Got C/AL?</title>
		<link>http://gotcal.com/index.php/2010/07/testing-app-v-for-dynamics-nav-rtc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Dynamics Community Syndication of Got C/AL?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gotcal.com/?p=499#comment-687</guid>
		<description>[...] streaming of Dynamics NAV RTC Testing App-V for Dynamics NAV R2 Posts about the App-V streaming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] streaming of Dynamics NAV RTC Testing App-V for Dynamics NAV R2 Posts about the App-V streaming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: App-V FAQ #19: Does App-V replace Citrix XenApp or Remote Desktop Services?</title>
		<link>http://gotcal.com/index.php/2010/07/testing-app-v-for-dynamics-nav-rtc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>App-V FAQ #19: Does App-V replace Citrix XenApp or Remote Desktop Services?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gotcal.com/?p=499#comment-430</guid>
		<description>[...] to end-points with App-V and confuse this with remote presentation of applications. See the comments on this post as an example. If you’ve come here seeking an answer to this question, then you should first read [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to end-points with App-V and confuse this with remote presentation of applications. See the comments on this post as an example. If you’ve come here seeking an answer to this question, then you should first read [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikaela Anciso</title>
		<link>http://gotcal.com/index.php/2010/07/testing-app-v-for-dynamics-nav-rtc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikaela Anciso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gotcal.com/?p=499#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Hi and thanks for discussing this info, I do not know about everyone else, but I can totally use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi and thanks for discussing this info, I do not know about everyone else, but I can totally use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://gotcal.com/index.php/2010/07/testing-app-v-for-dynamics-nav-rtc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gotcal.com/?p=499#comment-345</guid>
		<description>It seems there are several ways to use App-V. It can either execute the applications on the App-V Application Server or &quot;cached&quot; directly on the client. I guess the first method will give the same network benefits as a Citrix configuration, and therefore very usefull in a multi-site enviroment. Looking forward to see your results from testing COM - that could really make it a Citrix killer :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems there are several ways to use App-V. It can either execute the applications on the App-V Application Server or &#8220;cached&#8221; directly on the client. I guess the first method will give the same network benefits as a Citrix configuration, and therefore very usefull in a multi-site enviroment. Looking forward to see your results from testing COM &#8211; that could really make it a Citrix killer <img src='http://gotcal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SNielsen</title>
		<link>http://gotcal.com/index.php/2010/07/testing-app-v-for-dynamics-nav-rtc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>SNielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gotcal.com/?p=499#comment-344</guid>
		<description>Peter, im pretty sure this is an alternative to RDP/Citrix multi-site environments. I found some background information on App-V here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/App-V.
I have not had any time this last week testing the features, as i have been onsite at a customers site all week. But im particularly interested in seeing how Automation controls etc. are handled.
As far as i can see the App-V client is updateable by Windows Update, so that makes updates pretty easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, im pretty sure this is an alternative to RDP/Citrix multi-site environments. I found some background information on App-V here <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/App-V" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/App-V</a>.<br />
I have not had any time this last week testing the features, as i have been onsite at a customers site all week. But im particularly interested in seeing how Automation controls etc. are handled.<br />
As far as i can see the App-V client is updateable by Windows Update, so that makes updates pretty easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://gotcal.com/index.php/2010/07/testing-app-v-for-dynamics-nav-rtc-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gotcal.com/?p=499#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update Søren, however I still find it hard to see what benefits this provides. I only see it as an alternative way to deploy new NAV versions, and not an alternative to RDP/Citrix for multi-site enviroments. Is that correct? If so, then I can’t help wonder if there will be more updates to the NAV client than to the App-V client it self, or is the App-V client also ”self updating”, like i.e. Google Chrome?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update Søren, however I still find it hard to see what benefits this provides. I only see it as an alternative way to deploy new NAV versions, and not an alternative to RDP/Citrix for multi-site enviroments. Is that correct? If so, then I can’t help wonder if there will be more updates to the NAV client than to the App-V client it self, or is the App-V client also ”self updating”, like i.e. Google Chrome?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 399/400 objects using disk: basic

Served from: gotcal.com @ 2012-02-04 19:37:04 -->
